![]() |
"an activist organisation that examines issues of censorship, freedom and ethics amongst library and information workers..." |
|
|
ISC 12. Book Review, Capitalism in Crisis, by Fidel CastroCapitalism in crisis by Fidel Castro, published by Ocean Press, and available from Global Book Marketing, 38 King Street, London WC2E 8JT at £15.00 inc. postage. This volume captures Fidel Castros views on globalisation and world politics today, in speeches made at international, regional and Cuban gatherings from May 1998 to April 2000. The theme of globalism and neo-liberalism runs through these speeches, but not in a repetitive way. Fidel can adapt his talk to suit his audience, without being boring or patronising. Since the earliest days of the Revolution, Fidel has been a great communicator, and he has the gift of turning complex social, economic and political issues into language that ordinary people can understand. Anyone who has read Fidels early speeches when he addressed mass crowds in Havanas revolution square on issues such as land reform and racism will remember that he constantly asked his audience Do you understand what I am saying? Fidel has always made sure that his messages are understood by the people of Cuba. One of the techniques that he employs for this purpose is that of analogy. Here is an example:
This metaphor, used in Fidels opening speech to the South Summit, 12 April 2000 is a powerful device for conveying his message. The global economy Fidel points out how Americas departure from the gold standard, the printing of dollars, and its ownership of the IMF and World Bank, allows the US to dominate the worlds economy. In this context he sees the Euro as a welcome development to counter the power of the dollar and those on the left who are opposed to a federal Europe should take note. Neo-liberalism has widened the gap between rich and poor:
Neo-liberalism has not worked:
Neo liberalism has created madhouse economics:
The Soviet Union and Russia Fidels analysis of the downfall of the Soviet Union is that this was not caused by internal contradictions, but by external forces:
Fidel looks at the effect of neo-liberalism on Russia:
The Cuban Revolution Fidel points out the achievements of the Cuban education, health and social welfare systems and the spirit of internationalism which pervades Cuban teachers and doctors who have worked, in their thousands, in many Latin American and African countries, often in the most inaccessible areas. Fidel explains how he read Marx and Engels to make sense out of life:
He then put these ideas into practice in Cuba, but for this he needed the assistance of the Soviet Union who gave Cuba oil, raw materials, food and many other things, in return for sugar. But, above all else, the Soviet Union gave Cuba:
This is a reference to the US blockade (imposed on Cuba as a reaction to land reform), the Bay of Pigs invasion, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Special Period (made necessary by the collapse of the Soviet Union and the tightening of the US blockade), and the many attempts on Fidels life: "In summary, do you know how many assassination plots were investigated and known about in various degrees? A total of 637." Capitalism and Communism The twentieth century was dominated by a global struggle between Capitalism which is
Another distinction is that "they have infinite financial capital and almost zero human capital. We are doing things with zero financial capital but substantial human capital created throughout these 40 years." As for the much vaunted two party system, the Democratic and Republican Parties "are so exactly alike that they have established a true one-party system, or better still, the most perfect single-party system in the world, through this fabulous mechanism of having two parties resembling each other like two peas in a pod." US and UK leaders "need to tell the world something, so they say that everything they are doing is aimed at a future when the whole world is middle class." Owing to the lies, misinformation and propaganda spread about Cuba by the USA:
Yugoslavia and Iraq Fidel condemns the attack on Yugoslavia: "During the 45 years that the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia existed there was peace among all those ethnic groups." Having created thousands of refugees, America and Britain took in only a handful each: "The two countries combined assisted some 0.8 percent of the refugees a rather negligible number." Fidel also condemns the bombing of Iraq: "The two main leaders, of course, are the United States and the United Kingdom. They are also the two countries bombing Iraq every day. Nobody remembers this, but it happens every day. It has become a habit, a daily shooting exercise to preserve their right to bomb every day." Fidel compares the cost of these wars with other uses for the money: "With $1 billion, two million children can be saved; with $2 billion, four million children; with $2.2 billion, you could save the lives of 4.4 million children. Everyone knows, including the World Health Organisation, that about 12 million children die of curable diseases." He makes a similar point regarding the cost of US election campaigns: "The resources spent in just one of these election years would be enough to build all the schools the world needsand with a small amount of the annual figure, they could offer school meals to all the children who need it, and pay teachers a decent salary." The Battle of Ideas Fidel recalls how he was saved from death in his guerilla struggle against Batista, when he was captured and protected by a Lieutenant who told his men You cannot kill ideas, you cannot kill ideas:
Not all global threats are bad:
And so, as ever, Fidel leaves us with a positive message: that progressive ideas are worth talking about and fighting for; that taking on the IMF and World Bank can make a difference; and that there is space for all of us to live happy, successful and peaceful lives on this global ship, planet Earth.
|
|
Webmaster - Paul Catherall For enquiries contact isc-journal libr.org
All articles, reviews or other works are the copyright of the respective author(s) as shown. |
||